S.Prabakaran v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Original Petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. was dismissed because the Government Advocate submitted the crime number was not known, making the petition defective.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to file a fresh anticipatory bail petition quoting the correct crime number.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Fifth day of November Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V. THAMILSELVI
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.18039 of 2021
1 S.PRABAKARAN [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 M.C.SELVARAJ 3 S.DEVI
4 S.SOWMIYA
Vs
STATE BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, ERODE.
[ RESPONDENT ]
CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2021
For Petitioner : M/S. L.P.SHANMUGASUNDARAM Advocate
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.PRABAKARAN
- petitioner
M.C.SELVARAJ
- petitioner
S.DEVI
- petitioner
S.SOWMIYA
- respondent
STATE BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, ERODE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court