Disposed

Sumeer @ Vikramathithan v. State Rep by

Madras HC27 Oct 2021CRL MP/10920/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous petition, the Madras High Court extended by two weeks the time for the petitioner to surrender and comply with the conditions of a prior anticipatory bail order dated 05/03/2020. The court accepted the reasons cited in the petitioner's affidavit. No other substantive legal principles were laid down. The order is confined to extension of time.

What did the court decide?

Time extended by two weeks for the petitioner to surrender and comply with the conditions of the bail order dated 05.03.2020.

Sumeer @ Vikramathithan Vs State Rep by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Twenty Seventh day of October Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.10920 of 2021

¶7

¶8

CRL OP.4981/2020

¶9

SUMEER @ VIKRAMATHITHAN [ PETITIONER ]

¶10

¶11

STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, B-1, THIRUVALLUR TOWN POLICE STATION, CHENNAI. CR.NO.109/2020.

¶12

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to extend the time to surrender before the court in pursuance with order dated 05.03.2020 made in Crl.O.P.No.4981 of 2020.

¶13

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. R.SASIKUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶14

Vide Order dated 05.03.2021, this Court had granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner on certain conditions. This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking extension of time to comply with the conditions.

¶15

Being satisfied with the reasons shown in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the prayer sought for by the petitioner deserves to be considered favourably.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Accordingly, time is extended by a further period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order for the petitioner to comply with the conditions. All other conditions remain unaltered.

¶18

-sd/-

¶19

27/10/2021

¶20

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶21

TRUE COPY

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶23

¶24

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I, THIRUVALLUR

¶25

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUVALLUR(FOR INFORMATION)

¶26

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, B-1, THIRUVALLUR TOWN POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

¶27

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶28

C.C. to M/S. R.SASIKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges Sr.11940

Order

in CRL MP.10920/2021

in CRL OP.4981/2020

Date :27/10/2021

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶34

RVR 09/11/2021

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Sumeer @ Vikramathithan v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sumeer @ Vikramathithan v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arunkumar Vs State Rep by

Selvaraj Vs State Rep by

Uma Vs the Inspector of Police

Krishnaraj Vs Lakshmi

Kumar Vs State by

S.Sankar @ Deva Vs State Rep by