14.The main defence taken by the learned counsel for the appellant is that since the appellant made arrangements to marry the victim girl to her sister's son, who is a physically challenged person, the victim girl made a false complaint against the accused. However, it has not been established by the defence that the victim girl was having love affair with other person and in order to escape from that marriage, a false complaint has been foisted against the appellant. Since the victim girl is a minor, she has not gone to the extent of making such false complaint against the appellant under the POCSO Act and if the appellant made any arrangements to conduct the marriage, prima facie the victim girl would have filed a complaint against the appellant under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006. Therefore, the defence taken by the learned counsel for the appellant is not acceptable. Further, the appellant has also not examined any witness on his side to establish that, due to such marriage proposal, a false case was registered against him. Even though the appellant need not come to the witness box and establish his defence, when the evidence of the prosecution witnesses and the medical report are very effective, it is the duty of the accused to establish his defence, especially under the POCSO Act, and the presumptions are to be rebutted by the accused, however, in this case, the same has not been done by the appellant in the manner known to law. Therefore, from the evidence of P.W.1/victim girl, P.W.2/mother of the victim girl, P.W.11/Doctor, Ex.P.2/Statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C, Ex.P.3/Xerox copy of Transfer Certificate, Ex.P7/Age Certificate of the victim girl and
