3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would strongly object the petition and submits that the victim was 8 years old at the time of occurrence, and when the victim went to the park nearby her house for play, the accused took her to the nearby vacant house and made her to lie down on the floor, and removed her panty and pressed his private part in the genitalia of the victim child and has committed aggravated penetrative sexual assault on the victim child. Thereafter, her mother filed the complaint (Ex.P1) and after enquiry, the Police registered the case for the offence under Section 5 (m) r/w 6 of POCSO Act, and filed a charge sheet. The learned Judge, after considering the facts, rightly convicted the petitioner for the offence under Section 5 (m) of POCSO Act, which is punishable under Section 6 of the POCSO Act, and if the petitioner is released on bail, there is a possibility of the tampering the witnesses and therefore, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) strongly objects the petition. The learned Sessions Judge, on proper appreciation of evidence, rightly convicted the petitioner, which warrants no interference.
