V. Abudagir, v. M.a.Murugesan
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner filed a contempt petition for disobeying an order granting 4th and 5th review benefits. The respondents submitted that the order was complied with via a dated 27.04.2021 proceeding. Finding compliance, the Court closed the contempt petition.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition stands closed as the impugned order has been complied with by the respondents.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 29.10. 2021
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice D.KRISHNAKUMAR
Cont. P(MD) No.586 of 2021 in W.P.(MD)No.18894 of 2020
V.Abuthagir
...Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
1.Thiru.M.A.Murugesan, Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Bye Pass Road,
Madurai – 16.
2.Thiru.N.Ganesan, General Manager, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Dindigul Region, Bye Pass Road,
Dindigul.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to punish the respondents for wilfully disobeying the orders passed earlier in the associated Writ Petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.Abuthagir
- respondent
Thiru.M.A.Murugesan
- respondent
Thiru.N.Ganesan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court