M.Thavamani, v. Murugesan
Case brief
What is this about?
Court closed the contempt petition upon record that respondents complied with the previous order by filing a memo. Petitioner aggrieved may challenge calculations elsewhere.
What the court decided
Cont.P.(MD) No.559 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :22.10.2021 CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR Cont.P.(MD) No.559 of 2021
M.Thavamani ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Thiru Murugesan, The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Madurai Region, Madurai.
2.Tmt. Bhama, The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Employees' Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnors/respondents for willfully disobeying and not complying with the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 05.12.2019 in W.P.(MD)No.25932 of 2019.
Prayer in WP(MD). 25932/ 2019 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court Directing the respondents to pay interest at the rate of 18 percent per annum, for the priod of delay from 0110-2018 to 21-09-2019, in paying the amounts paid towards the terminal and pension benefits of the petitioner namely EPF Employees Contribution, Gratuity, Encashment of Earned/Sick Leaves and commutated Value of Pension, within a time a frame as may be fixed by this Honourable Court and without affecting his right to claim balance amounts towards those benefits.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Thavamani
- respondent
Thiru Murugesan
- respondent
Tmt. Bhama
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court