P.M. Raju, v. Murugesan
Case brief
What is this about?
This court closed a contempt petition alleging non-compliance with a prior order regarding pension and terminal benefits. Relying on the respondents' memo confirming compliance, the court dismissed the contempt proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed; petitioner to challenge calculation discrepancies before appropriate forum.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.(MD) No.552 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :22.10.2021 CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR Cont.P.(MD) No.552 of 2021
P.M.Raju ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Thiru Murugesan,
The Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Madurai Region, Madurai.
2.Tmt. Bhama, The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Employees' Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnor/respondents for willfully disobeying and not complying with the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 24.01.2020 in W.P.(MD)No.1458 of 2020.
Prayer in WP(MD). 1458/ 2020 :
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.M.Raju
- respondent
Thiru Murugesan
- respondent
Tmt. Bhama
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court