M.Ganesan v. M.a.Murugesan
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition raising a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act regarding unpaid suspension salary, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court recorded the submission that the court order had been complied with and closed the contempt petition.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed on the submission that the underlying order has been complied with.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONT P(MD)No.236 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.04.2021 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
CONT P(MD)No.236 of 2021 in W.P(MD)No.4672 of 2020
M.Ganesan ... Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs
1.Thiru.M.A.Murugesan, Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Madurai – 16.
2.Thiru.Rajeswaran,
General Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Madurai Region,
Madurai – 16. ... Contemnors / Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for committing contempt for the willful disobedience of the order in W.P(MD)No.4672 of 2020 dated 05.03.2020.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be prosecuted for willful disobedience of the previous order regarding suspension salary and interest.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Ganesan
- respondent
M.A.Murugesan
- respondent
Rajeswaran
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court