P.Vasagar, S/O. Perumal Thevar v. Thiru. Rajeshwaran
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging non-compliance of a previous order in W.P(MD)No.6999 of 2016 regarding pension and gratuity. Respondents claimed compliance but calculation disputed. Court granted liberty to work out remedy and closed the petition without adjudication.
What the court decided
CONT.P(MD)No.1889 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 11.02.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
CONT.P(MD)No.1889 of 2018 in
W.P(MD)No.6999 of 2016
P.Vasagar
.. Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
- Rajeshwaran,
The General Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.Vasagar
- respondent
Rajeshwaran
- respondent
Muniyappan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court