S.Hariharan v. K.S.Kandasamy, I.A.S
Case brief
What is this about?
A single-line order closing a contempt petition (C.P. 900 of 2020) after the District Collector recommended the petitioner's appointment as Junior Revenue Inspector, satisfying the prior court order.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition was closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.02.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Contempt Petition No.900 of 2020
S.Hariharan,
M/315, 59 th Grace,
New A.S.D.E. Audco,
Hosur Town, Krishnagiri District. ..Petitioner
vs.
Mr.K.S.Kandasamy, I.A.S.
The District Collector,
Cheyyur Circle,
Thiruvannamalai District Respondent
PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for willfully disobeying the order made in WP No.406 of 2020 dated 13.02.2020.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Beulah John For Respondent : Mr.S.N.Parthasarathi Standing Counsel
ORDER
This contempt petition has been filed to punish the respondent for willful
disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P.No.406 of 2020 dated 13.02.2020.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner was willfully disobeying the court order regarding his appointment as Junior Revenue Inspector.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Hariharan
- respondent
Mr.K.S.Kandasamy
Coram
N. Anand Venkatesh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court