The High Court dismissed the petition's factual grounds as inapplicable for quashing. The order disposed of the matter by directing the lower court to complete proceedings within three months and conduct trial on day-to-day basis.
Directed the Court below to complete proceedings within three months and conduct trial on day to day basis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 04.02.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Crl. OP No.82 of 2019 and
Crl. MP No.53 of 2019
M.Mohamad Nawaz ... Petitioner/Accused
vs. H.Siraj Ali ... Respondent/ Complainant
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records pertaining to the case in STC No.208 of 2018 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track), Tiruchengode, quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr. N.Manokaran For Respondent : Mr.A.R.Nixon
ORDER
This petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in STC No.208 of 2018 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track), Tiruchengode.
petitioner and remand him to custody as per the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. SHAMBHU NATH SINGH (JT 2001 (4) SC 3191) . Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track),
Tiruchengode.
+1cc to M/s.A.R.Nixon, Advocate SR.NO.6247
+1cc to Mr.N.Manokaran, Advocate SR.NO..6039
AKM/26.02.21/ 2P-4C/
Crl. OP No.82 of 2019
and Crl. MP No.53 of 2019
04.02.2021
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can allow factual grounds raised by the petitioner under Section 482 CrPC for quashing proceedings.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vinod Kumar vs State of PunjabReferred¶14
Vinod Kumar Vs State of Punjab [2015 (1) MLJ (Crl) 288 SC]
State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Shambhu Nath SinghReferred¶16
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. SHAMBHU NATH SINGH (JT 2001 (4) SC 3191) · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.Mohamad Nawaz
H.Siraj Ali
N. Anand Venkatesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
