, The High Court dismissed a petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willful disobedience. The court held the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner lacked the case bundle and was unable to answer questions.
, The contempt petition was dismissed for non-prosecution; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.751 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.10.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
Cont.P.No.751 of 2015 in
C.A.No.1740 of 2009 in C.P.No.51 of 2007
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., Rep. By its Vice President, No.3, Dass India Tower, 2nd Floor, 2nd Line Beach, Parrys, Chennai – 600 001. ...Petitioner Vs.
3.Santhanam Kalyanasundaram, Director, Kothari Industrial Corporation Ltd., 78/1/3, L.B.Road, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai – 600041.
4.Chetan Vijay Pagariya, Director, Kothari Industrial Corporation Ltd., Badgujar Complex Compound New, Umrao Palace Parola Road, Dhule – 424 004, Maharashtra.
1/2
Cont.P.No.751 of 2015
5.T.Sankaran,
Director, Kothari Industrial Corporation Ltd., No.114, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.
6.G.Mohan Das,
Company Secretary, Kothari Industrial Corporation Ltd., No.114, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. ...Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, seeking to punish the respondents for willful disobedience and flouting of the direction and the order passed by this Hon'ble Court dated 22.12.2009 in C.A.No.1740 of 2009 in C.P.No.51 of 2007.
The learned counsel for the petitioner does not possess the bundle. She unable to answer the questions of the Court. It is a sheer negligence on the part of the counsel. Hence, this contempt petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs.
SD/-
kkn
Dated at Madras this the day of 2022.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ GS/07/01/2022
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be proceeded with or dismissed due to non-prosecution by counsel.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
Pradip Dayanand Kothari
Surekha Pradip Kothari
Santhanam Kalyanasundaram
Chetan Vijay Pagariya
T. Sankaran
R. Subramanian
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
