V.Rajeswari v. Mr.Harmander Singh I.A.S.
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 filed by Salem Corporation retirees against officials for disobeying prior Court order. Court found order complied with and closed petition.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.491 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.09.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
Cont.P.No.491 of 2021
1.V.Rajeswari,
Working as Superintendent in Salem Corporation, No.55/28, Narayanan Nagar, 4th Street, Salem – 636 015
2.J.Karthikeyan
Working as Superintendent in Salem Corporation, No.3/166-3, Prakasam Nagar, 1st Avenue, 5th Cross Street, Salem – 636 008
3.N.Murugesan
Working as Superintendent in Salem Corporation, No.98/6, Ponnusamy East Street, Ramanathapuram, Kannakurichy Main Road, Salem – 636 008
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.Rajeswari and others
- respondent
Harmander Singh
- respondent
K.Baskaran
- respondent
Ravichandran
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court