Leave to file a civil suit for recovery of money against a respondent outside the jurisdiction was granted to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
Leave to file the suit against the second respondent residing outside the jurisdiction was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Application No.3225 of 2021
V.PARTHIBAN.,J.
Seeking leave to file suit as against the second respondent/second defendant, the applicant/plaintiff has come up with this application.
Office of the first respondent is at Chennai but the second respondent who is acting as per the instructions of the first respondent is residing outside the jurisdiction of this Court. To avoid multiplicity of proceedings, leave is necessary to file single suit in respect of all the items of suit properties, the learned counsel contended.
the applicant and taking note of the averments made in the plaint, leave is granted.
mrm
2
V.PARTHIBAN,J.
mrm
A. No.3225 of 2021
14.09.2021
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to file a suit should be granted against a defendant residing outside the jurisdiction to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
V.PARTHIBAN
Second Respondent
V.PARTHIBAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
