Dismissed

M.v.Ramani v. Honble Sri Justice T.v.Masilamani

Madras HC29 Apr 2021CONT P/370/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of a prior order. Both sides submitted that the impugned order dated 20.03.2019 in WP No.8151 of 2019 has been complied with. The Court closed the contempt petition recording the submission made by learned counsel on both sides.

What did the court decide?

The contempt petition was closed on the submission that the prior order had been complied with.

M.v.Ramani Vs Honble Sri Justice T.v.Masilamani — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Cont.P.No.370 of 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED :29.04.2021

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE Mrs.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA

¶6

Contempt Petition No.370 of 2020

¶7

M.V.Ramani, Old No.52, New No.18, Subramaniam Street,

¶8

West Mambalam, Chennai – 600 033

¶9

... Petitioner

¶10

Vs.

¶11

Hon'ble Sri Justice T.V.Masilamani, Chairman,

¶12

The Private Schools Fee Determination Committee, D.P.I.Campus, Chennai 600 006.

¶13

Mr.Karuppuswamy, Director of Mat.Schools, D.P.I.Campus,

¶14

College Road, Chennai 600 006.

¶15

Mr.P.K.Suresh Kumar-Secretary/Authorised Signatory Sri Sitaram Vidyalala Mat.Hr.Sec.School, Run By Sri Ramsamaj, Ramakrishnapuram First Street(Lane), West Mambalam, Chennai 600 003.

¶16

Mr.S.Ravichandran - President, Sri Ramsamaj-Educational Agency, A Society under the Societies Registration Act, Rep by its Committee of Management, Arya Gowda Road, West Mambalam, Chennai 600 033 ... Respondents

¶17

Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to consider and punish the respondents 1 and 4 for having https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

1/3

¶19

Cont.P.No.370 of 2020

¶20

committed willful and deliberate disobedience of the orders of this Court dated 20.03.2019 in W.P.No.8151 of 2019 by initiating appropriate contempt proceedings and deciding the same in accordance with law.

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.C.V.Subramanian

¶22

For Respondents1 and 2 : Mr.C.Munusamy,

¶23

Special Government Pleader(Edn)

¶24

For respondents 3 and 4 : Ms.Simran

¶25

for Mr.R.Parthasarathy

¶26

O R D E R

¶27

The Contempt Petition has been filed seeking to punish the

¶28

respondents for willful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.8151 of 2019 dated 20.03.2019.

¶29

When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel on both sides submitted that the order dated 20.03.2019 passed by

¶30

this Court in W.P.No.8151 of 2019 has been complied with.

¶31

Recording the submission made by the learned counsel on either

¶32

side, this Contempt Petition is closed.

¶33

SD/-

¶34

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)

¶35

srn

¶36

//Certified to be true copy//

¶37

Dated at Madras this the day of 2021.

¶38

COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25^th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶39

2/3

¶40

Cont.P.No.370 of 2020

¶41

GS/07/07/2021

¶42

¶43

The Chairman,

¶44

The Private Schools Fee Determination Committee, D.P.I.Campus, Chennai 600 006.

¶45

The Director of Mat.Schools, D.P.I.Campus, College Road, Chennai 600 006.

¶46

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶47

3/3

M.v.Ramani v. Honble Sri Justice T.v.Masilamani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.v.Ramani v. Honble Sri Justice T.v.Masilamani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Santhi Vs The District Collector

N.Rajan Vs The Block Medical Officer Rch / Nrhm

V.Vasanthraj Vs The District Registrar

Umadevi Sivalingam Vs Regional Passport Officer

Mrs.R.Glory Lilly Christy Vs The District Collector

Siddharth Senthilkumar Vs Union of India