This court dismissed a writ petition challenging the non-consideration of the petitioner's candidature for stamp vendors. The respondent accepted that procedures were complete, making any fresh consideration futile.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 28.04.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
W.P. No.10651 of 2021
V.Vasanthraj .. Petitioner
Vs.
The District Registrar Office of the District Registrar Arakonam, Ranipet District Tamil Nadu .. Respondent
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to consider petitioner candidature for the stamp vendors at the vacancy place of Sub Registration Office, Sholingur without insisting solvency certificate.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.R.Thiruneelakandan For Respondents : Mr.T.M.Pappiah, Spl. Govt. Pleader O R D E R
The writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent to consider petitioner's candidature for the stamp vendors at the vacancy place of Sub Registrar Office, Sholingur without insisting solvency certificate.
therefore, he was not called for the interview for the post of Stamp Vendors. He further represents that all the procedures are over and all the vacancies are filled up and there is no point in considering the candidature of the petitioner, as it would only be a futile exercise.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court should direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's candidature for sticker vendors without insisting solvency certificate.
V.Vasanthraj
The District Registrar Office of the District Registrar Arakonam, Ranipet District Tamil Nadu
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
