V.Murugan v. K.Rajkumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt Petition filed to punish respondent Tahsildar for alleged wilful disobedience of an earlier order. The court accepted the submission that subsistence allowance had been sanctioned and communicated, thereby closing the petition without costs.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition closed; no costs awarded.
What the court decided
Contp.No.1195 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.04.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Contempt Petition No.1195 of 2020
Mr.V.Murugan, No.2/244, Bharathiar Street, Sirucheri Village, Navalur Post, Thiruporur Taluk, Kancheepuram District-600 130 ... Petitioner Vs.
Mr.K.Rajkumar Tahsildar Tahsildar's Office, Thiruporur, Thandalam – 603 105 Old-Kanchipuram District, New Chengalpattu District
... Respondent
Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 07.02.2019 passed in W.P.No.4328 of 2018.
For Petitioner : M/s.Devadason and Sagar For Respondent : Mr.R.S.Selvam Government Advocate
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.Murugan
- respondent
Mr.K.Rajkumar Tahsildar
Coram
S.M.Sybruamianiam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court