Makesh, v. The Transport Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court suo-motu impleaded G. Pankajam as 10th respondent regarding a civil dispute and directed notice to be served within four weeks, listing the matter for subsequent hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.33021 of 2023
P.VELMURUGAN, J.,
On a perusal of the rejection order dated 12.01.2023 passed by the District Registrar, South Madras, it is seen that one G.Pankajam approached
the Civil Court with regard to the dispute between the parties. The petitioner has not impleaded the abovesaid Pankajam in the present case. Hence, this Court suo-motu impleads the said Pankajam, W/o,M.R.Gurumurthy, 21/50, Kumara Kovil Street, Thiruvarur, as 10th respondent in the present writ petition. Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the cause list.
- Notice to the impleaded tenth respondent returnable in four weeks.
Private notice is also permitted. Affidavit of service to be filed by then.
- List the matter after four weeks.
29.11.2023
mfa
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P. VELMURUGAN
Coram
P. VELMURUGAN, J.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court