This contempt petition, filed for disobedience of a court order dated 06.08.2020, was disposed of after the respondent Special Government Pleader submitted that compliance had been effected via an order dated 18.03.2021, resulting in the closure of the petition.
The Contempt Petition stands closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P. No.1166 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 16.04.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Cont. P. No. 1166 of 2020
in W.P. No. 32147 of 2019
Versus
Ms.Kanimozhi, Tahsildar, Pallavaram Taluk, Kanchipuram Dt. ... Respondent/2nd Respondent
PRAYER : Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondent for the disobedience of
the orders of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P.No.32147 of 2019 dated
06.08.2020.
For Petitioner : M/s.N.Suresh For Respondent : Mr.E.Balamurugan, Special Govt. Pleader
1/3
Cont.P. No.1166 of 2020
O R D E R
(The case has been heard through video conference)
Earlier, this Court by an order dated 06.08.2020 in W.P.No.32147 of
2019 directed the 2nd respondent therein to pass necessary orders in
accordance with law within a period of eight weeks. Since the order was not
complied within a stipulated period, the present Contempt Petition has been filed.
duly complied with. Hence, no further adjudication is required. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition stands closed.
SD/-
rpp
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) //Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2021.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.
2/3
Cont.P. No.1166 of 2020
GS/01/07/2021
To
The Tahsildar, Pallavaram Taluk, Kanchipuram Dt.
3/3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to punish the respondent for non-compliance with a prior order directing them to pass necessary orders within eight weeks.
Whether the respondent's submission of an order dated 18.03.2021 constitutes compliance with the Supreme Court's earlier directive.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Jayanthi
Ms.Kanimozhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
