Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner and The Recovery Officer v. The Official Liquidator, High Court Madras
Case brief
What is this about?
in C.P.No.35 of 2001 SENTHILKUMAR…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
COMP.A.No.289 of 2021 in C.P.No.35 of 2001
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
The present application is filed to
condone the delay of 673 days in challenging the order of adjudication dated 13.11.2019 in claim No.1/35/2001.
Liquidator represents the Company in liquidation. Upon considering the affidavit in support of the application and, in particular, in paragraph No.10 thereof, the applicant has made out a sufficient cause to condone the delay. Accordingly, Comp.A.No.289 of 2021 is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs.
26.11.2021
bsm
1/1
Applicant
Deputy Official Liquidator
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court