Amutha v. Pitchai
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court held that since the decree involved a mandatory injunction, a previously granted stay made absolute and allowed the petition for stay orders.
What did the court decide?
Stay on all further proceedings made in O.S.No.61 of 2008 granted and made absolute.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Twenty Third day of February Two Thousand and Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice R.SUBRAMANIAN
CMP(MD) No.7494 of 2020 IN
SA(MD) No.727 of 2020
1 AMUTHA
- 2 KEERTHANA
- 3 GOWTHAM ... PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS
Vs
1 PITCHAI
- 2 VEERAMALAI
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant a permanent stay on proceedings in O.S.No.61 of 2008 pending disposal of the Second Appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
AMUTHA
- appellant
KEERTHANA
- appellant
GOWTHAM
- respondent
PITCHAI
- respondent
VEERAMALAI
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court