Petitioners failed to appear in a civil revision application challenging an interim order. The court dismissed the petition for default and directed the registry to post the main appeal.
Petition dismissed for default. Registry directed to post main appeal on 09.04.2021.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP(MD) No.5786 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Fifth day of March Two Thousand and Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice N.SATHISH KUMAR
CMP(MD) No.5786 of 2018
IN
SA(MD) No.667 of 2011
1 M.NATARAJAN
2 R.PANNERSELVAM
3 R.BALASUBRAMANIAN
... PETITIONERS/ RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 3/ RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3
Vs
1 K.MURUGESA GOUNDER
2 M.MEENAKSHI
... RESPONDENTS 1 & 2/ PETITIONERS/ APPELLANTS
K.RAMASAMY (DIED)
3 A.SUBBAIAH MUDALIAR 4 R.LAKSHMI 5 P.SANKARA GOUNDER
6 R.POONGODI
7 M/S.SUPREME TEX (FIRM) KARUR, REP.BY ITS MANAING PARTNER,
R.POONGODI,
P.PERIASAMY (DIED)
8 M.BALARU
9 K.SELVARAJ
10 K.MOHAN
11 M.KALYANI
12 P.MURUGESAN
13 SABAPATHY
14 P.PADMAVATHI
V.SUNDARAM (DIED),
P.PALANIAPPAN(DIED)
15 N.PERUMAL
16 R.BAKTHAVASALAM 17 R.THIYAGARAJAN
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 18 M.PALANIAPPAN
1/3
CMP(MD) No.5786 of 2018
19 M.MURUGAIYAN
20 M.RAMASAMY
21 P.SEKAR
22 P.SUBRAMANIAN
23 M.SAMPATH
24 M.RAVI
25 R.MARIMUTHU
26 S.GANESAN
27 K.KARUPPANAN
28 S.SARATHI
29 NAGAMMAL
30 M.VENGALAYEE
31 SARASWATHY 32 SULOCHANA 33 PALANIAMMAL 34 VIJAYAKUMAR 35 DEVARAJ
KARPAGAM (DIED)
36 KARPAGAM 37 MINOR.BANUMATHI 38 MINOR.SENTHILKUMAR
39 KALIAMMAL ... RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS (Minors 38 and 39 are represented by guardian mother 37th respondent Karpagam) (since the Respondents 3 to 39 are not necessary parties notice may be dispensed with)
Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble Court in M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2011 in S.A.(MD) No.667 of 2011 dated 12.07.2013.
PRAYER IN SA(MD) No.667 of 2011:
To prefer this memorandum of Second Appeal against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.102 of 2004 on the file of District Court, Karur dated 30.01.2010 reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.140 of 1993 on the file of Sub court, Karur dated 15.06.2004.
ORDER : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and Petitioner is not appeared either in person or by an advocate, the court made the following order:-
Today when the petition is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on the side of the petitioners.
2/3
CMP(MD) No.5786 of 2018
sd/05/03/2021 / TRUE COPY /
/ /2021
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
2 THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE, KARUR.
ORDER IN
CMP(MD) No.5786 of 2018
IN
SA(MD) No.667 of 2011
Date :05/03/2021
tsg MS/PN/SAR-2/10.03.2021/3P.3C
3/3
1 M.Natarajan
2 R.Pannerselvam
3 R.Balasubramanian
1 K.Murugesha Gounder
2 M.Meenakshi
N. Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
