Partly allowed

Noorjahan Beevi.S.K.a v. the Regional Transport Authority

Madras HC4 Mar 2021WP(MD)/4477/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking cancellation of fitness certificates for stage carriages. The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition, which was granted. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the writ petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.

Noorjahan Beevi.S.K.a Vs the Regional Transport… — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.4477 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 04.03.2021

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.4477 of 2021 and W.M.P.(MD)No.3599 of 2021

¶7

S.K.A.Noorjahan Beevi ... Petitioner

¶8

-Vs-

¶9

1.The Regional Transport Authority, cum The District Collector, Sivagangai.

¶10

2.The Regional Transport Officer, Sivagangai.

¶11

3.The Assistant Secretary-1, Office of the Transport Commissioner, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.

¶12

4.Mohamed Jamil 5.Mohamed Thowbieck ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to cancel the fitness certificate granted to the petitioners stage carriage bearing Reg.No.TN 65 Y 9516 and the spare bus bearing Reg.No.TN 65 Y 0526 with reference to the representation of the petitioner dated 15.04.2019 and 26.04.2019 to the respondents.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Govindraman

¶15

For Respondent Nos.1to3 : Mrs.M.Rajeswari Government Advocate

¶16

ORDER

¶17

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is granted.

¶18

2.In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition on the same https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

1/2

¶20

W.P.(MD)No.4477 of 2021

¶21

cause of action. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

Assistant Registrar (Crl)

¶24

// True Copy //

¶25

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶26

RMI

¶27

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶28

¶29

1.The Regional Transport Authority, cum The District Collector, Sivagangai.

¶30

2.The Regional Transport Officer, Sivagangai.

¶31

3.The Assistant Secretary-1, Office of the Transport Commissioner, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.

¶32

+1 CC to THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER(SR-9167[F] dated 05/03/2021)

¶33

Order made in W.P.(MD)No.4477 of 2021 and W.M.P.(MD)No.3599 of 2021 04.03.2021

¶34

NA(CO) SRS (15/03/2021) 2P : 5C

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶36

2/2

Noorjahan Beevi.S.K.a v. the Regional Transport Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Noorjahan Beevi.S.K.a v. the Regional Transport Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Selvi. P Vs The District Collector -Cum-

Gurusamy.R Vs the Government of Tamilnadu

Pradeepa.a Vs the District Collector Cum

Rajendran Vs State represented through

Sekar.a.S Vs the Dist Collector

M/S.v.v.Mineral Vs Union of India