K.Kailasam, v. Chandran
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed a petition to vacate an interim injunction and allowed a petition to make the interim injunction absolute in a civil appeal concerning property rights. The injunction rests despite claims of missing heirs.
What did the court decide?
C.M.P.(MD)No.2876 of 2021 dismissed; C.M.P.(MD)No.374 of 2021 allowed and interim injunction made absolute.
What the court decided
S.A.(MD)No.25 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Twenty Third day of March Two Thousand and Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.SUBRAMANIAN
C.M.P.(MD)Nos.2876 and 374 of 2021 in
S.A.(MD)No.25 of 2021
C.M.P.(MD)No.2876 of 2021 in S.A.(MD)No.25 of 2021:
K.KAILASAM ... PETITIONER/ RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT
Vs
1 CHANDRAN
2 POOVAIYAMMAL ... RESPONDENTS/ PETITIONERS/ APPELLANTS
PRAYER IN C.M.P.(MD)No.2876 of 2021 in S.A.(MD)No.25 of 2021:
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the high court should vacate the interim injunction granted in the pending second appeal.
Whether all legal heirs must be impleaded in a suit seeking permanent injunction.
Whether the interim injunction should be made absolute given the continued benefit of such order.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
1 CHANDRAN, 2 POOVAYIAMMAL
- respondent
K.KAILASAM
Coram
R.SUBRAMANIAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court