K.George v. v.Aravind
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition filed for disobedience of a pension order. Court found the previous order was complied with and closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition was closed as the underlying order was found compliant.
What the court decided
CONT.P(MD)No.76 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.03.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN CONT.P(MD)No.76 of 2020
K.George
: Petitioner
Vs.
- V.Aravind General Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Tirunelveli Ltd., Ranithottam, Nagercoil 629 001, Kanyakumari District
- K.Pama Administrator,
Tamil Nadu Transport Corporation Employees Pension Trust, Thiruvallur House, Pallavan Salai, Chennai 600 002
: Contemnors/2nd & 3rd Respondents
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.George
- respondent
V.Aravind
- respondent
K.Pama
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court