Allowed

Geetha Raman, v. Dhanya Meenakshi

Madras HC25 Mar 2021CMP(MD)/2847/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This miscellaneous civil petition for dissolution of marriage was disposed of based on a Memorandum of Compromise filed by the petitioner and the respondent with the consent of both parties and their respective counsel on the date of hearing. The Court ordered the dissolution of the marriage solemnized on 22.02.2007 and directed that there be no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

The marriage solemnized between the petitioner and respondent on 22.02.2007 is dissolved by this order; no order as to costs.

Geetha Raman, Vs Dhanya Meenakshi — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

CMP(MD).No.2847 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

(Civil Appellate Jurisdiction)

¶4

Thursday, the Twenty Fifth day of March Two Thousand and Twenty One

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice R.SUBRAMANIAN

¶7

CMP(MD).No.2847 of 2021 in TR CMP(MD)No.44 of 2020

¶8

(H.M.O.P.No.151 of 2019 on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Karur)

¶9

P. Geetha Ramanan

¶10

...Petitioner / Husband

¶11

¶12

Dhanya Meenakshi ...Respondent / Wife

¶13

Prayer : Originally H.M.O.P.No.151 of 2019 was filed under section 13(1)(i-a)&(i-b) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, before the Family Court, Karur praying to pass a decree in favour of the petitioner dissolving the marriage held on 22.02.2007 between the petitioner and respondent at Master Mahal, Madurai. As per order dated 07.01.2021 passed in TR CMP(MD).No.44 of 2020, H.M.O.P.No.151 of 2019 was withdraw from the file of the Family Court, Karur and taken on file by this Court and renumbered as Civil Miscellaneous Petition (MD).No.2847 of 2021.

¶14

Decree: This Civil Miscellaneous Petition coming on for hearing on Thursday, the Seventh day of January, Two Thousand and Twenty One, upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of Mrs.M.Maria Vinola, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.R.Gandhi, Advocate for the respondent and considering the Memorandum of Compromise dated 21.12.2020 filed by both parties along with their counsel, this court on Thursday, the Seventh day of January, Two Thousand and Twenty One, doth Order and Decree as follows:-

¶15

1 That in view of the Memorandum of Compromise dated 21.12.2020 filed by both parties along with their counsel, the marriage solemnized the petitioner and the respondent on 22.02.2007 at Master Mahal, Madurai be and hereby is dissolved and;

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

1/2

¶18

CMP(MD).No.2847 of 2021

¶19

2 That there be no order as to costs in this Civil Miscellaneous Petition.

¶20

Assistant Registrar(CS-II)

¶21

// True Copy //

¶22

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶23

¶24

The Judge, Family Court, Karur

¶25

Copy to:

¶26

The Record Keeper, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai (+2copies)

¶27

+1 CC to M/s.M.MARIA VINOLA, Advocate SR-488

¶28

(Memorandum of Compromise is enclosed herewith)

¶29

DATE OF ORDER: 25.03.2021 ----------------------------

¶30

DECREE

¶31

CMP(MD).No.2847 of 2021

¶32

(H.M.O.P.No.151 of 2019 on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Karur)

¶33

Disposed the CMP in view of the Memorandum of Compromise filed by both parties along with their counsel.

¶34

ns(CO)

¶35

TR(21.04.2021) 2P 5C

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶37

2/2

Geetha Raman, v. Dhanya Meenakshi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Geetha Raman, v. Dhanya Meenakshi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Pandiaraj Vs S.Mariappan (Died)

K.Nallamuthu Vs M.Chandran

K.Kailasam, Vs Chandran

N.Karuppanna Gounder(Died) Vs Kulanthaivel Gounder (Died)

W.R.Silpa Vs M.Varun

P.Sundarraj, Vs Velu