N.Loganathan v. S.Subramani

C.M.P.No.19423 of 2021 in W.A.(SR).No.104361 of 2021

M.DURAISWAMY, J. and

J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

Heard Mr.I.Abrar Md Abdullah for Mr.V.P.K.Gowtham, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.A.S.Narasimhan, learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 3, Mr.T.Chandrasekar, learned Additional Government Pleader (HR & CE) for the respondents 4 & 5 and Mr.A.K.Sriram, learned counsel for the 6^th respondent.

2.We are satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, hence, the petition is ordered. However, the respondents are at liberty to make their submissions with regard to the locus standi of the petitioner when the Writ Appeal is taken up for hearing.

[M.D.,J.] [J.S.N.P.,J.] 14.12.2021

va

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis