The High Court ofMadras, in this C.M.P. arising from a Writ Appeal, condoned the delay in filing the writ appeal and disposed of the matter in the absence of the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.14523 of 2020 in W.A.(SR).No.92139 of 2020
M.DURAISWAMY, J. and
J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
There is a delay of 89 days in filing the Writ Appeal.
2.Though the notice sent to the respondent has been duly served and his name has been printed in the cause list, none appeared for him.
3.Since the petitioners have satisfactorily explained the reasons for the delay in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay is condoned.
4.The petition is ordered.
[M.D.,J.] [J.S.N.P.,J.] 09.12.2021
va
MDURAISWAMY
JSATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
