In C.M.A.SR.No.61300 of 2019, the Court condoned a delay of 129 days in filing the appeal based on the reasons contained in the affidavit. The appeal was allowed, and the registry was directed to number the appeal if otherwise in order.
Delay of 129 days condoned; appeal allowed; registry directed to number the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.16048 of 2021
in C.M.A.SR.No.61300 of 2019
T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J. and SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.
[Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J. ] (Through Video Conferencing)
Heard Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap, learned Standing Counsel appearing for Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Raghavan Ramabadran, learned counsel for the respondent.
2.Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay of 129 days in filing the appeal is condoned and the petition is allowed.
(T.S.S., J.) (S.S.K., J.) 24.09.2021
Note : Registry is directed to number the appeal, if otherwise in order.
mkn
Mr. A.P. Srinivas
Respondent
T.S. Sivagnanam
Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
