The single judge condoned the delay of 178 days in filing the appeal based on the affidavit's reasons and disposed of the petition accordingly.
178 days delay in representing the appeal was condoned and the petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P. No. 15631 of 2021
in C.M.A. No. SR 114055 of 2019
C.M.P. No. 15631 of 2021 in C.M.A. No. SR 114055 of 2019
T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.
and
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.
(Order of the Court was made by
T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.)
Heard Mr. A.P.Srinivas, Learned Senior
Standing Counsel for the appellant.
2. Accepting the reasons stated in the
affidavit filed in support of the petition, the
delay of 178 days in representing the above
appeal is condoned. This petition is ordered.
[T.S.S., J.] [S.S.K., J.]
28.09.2021
Sp/Maya
1/1
T.SIVAGNANAM
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
