Allowed

K.Ponnammal v. the Special Tahsildar

Madras HC9 Sept 2021CMP/13969/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of two consolidated constitutional revision petitions. The court ordered C.M.P.No.13969 of 2021 allowing recognition of specific appellants as legal heirs of the deceased first appellant. It also ordered C.M.P.No.13971 of 2021, impleading the deceased fifth appellant's widow and reserving a liberty to implead her daughters at a later stage.

What did the court decide?

C.M.P.No.13969 of 2021 ordered as prayed. C.M.P.No.13971 of 2021 ordered with liberty to implead daughters later.

K.Ponnammal Vs the Special Tahsildar — Succession and Inheritance | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

C.M.P.Nos.13969 and 13971 of 2021

¶3

¶4

A.S.S.R.No.27844 of 2021

¶5

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J. and KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

¶6

C.M.P.No.13969 of 2021 is filed seeking to recognize the appellants

¶7

2 to 7 as the legal heirs of the first appellant, viz., K.Ponnammal, who are

¶8

all ready on record in the above appeal.

¶9

C.M.P.No.13971 of 2021 is filed seeking to implead Kalarani Sivasubramaniam, as the legal heir of late Sivasubramaniam (5^th appellant), who passed away on 13.05.2021, as the 8^th appellant in the above appeal.

¶10

The said Sivasubramaniam (5^th appellant) died on 13.05.2021

¶11

leaving behind his wife, viz., Kalarani Sivasubramaniam and his daughters, viz., Akilandeeswari and Shalini as his legal heirs.

¶12

The learned counsel for the petitioners/appellants had expressed difficulty in impleading the daughters, Akilandeeswari and Shalini as legal heirs of the deceased fifth appellant, as they are living in United States of

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶14

¶15

America and now, for the present, he is impleading only the wife of the deceased, viz., Kalarani Sivasubramaniam, as legal heir of the deceased fifth appellant.

¶16

Upon hearing the submission made by the learned counsel for the

¶17

petitioners/appellants and on being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, C.M.P.No.13971 of 2021 is ordered. Liberty is given to the petitioners/appellants to implead the daughters, Akilandeeswari and Shalini as legal heirs of the deceased Sivasubramaniam, at a later point.

¶18

Since the appellants 2 to 7 are already on record as the legal heirs of the first appellant, viz., K.Ponammal in the above appeal,

¶19

C.M.P.No.13969 of 2021 filed seeking to recognize the appellants 2 to 7 as

¶20

the legal heirs of the first appellant is ordered as prayed for.

¶21

(P.S.N.J,) (K.R.J,) 09.09.2021

¶22

srn

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶24

¶25

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J. and KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

¶26

C.M.P.Nos.13969 and 13971 of 2021
in
A.S.S.R.No.27844 of 2021
09.09.2021

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

K.Ponnammal v. the Special Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Ponnammal v. the Special Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Principal Secretary/Member Secretary Vs a.Jayachitra

R.Mohan Ranganathan Vs S.a.Bhimaraja

M.Madanagiri Vs the District Collector

S.Kalaiselvi Vs the Inspector General of Registration

K.Ponnammal, Vs the Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition Officer)

K.Ponnammal (Since Deceased) Vs the Special Tahsildar