Kavitha W/O. Senthil Kumar v. Marimuthu
Case brief
What is this about?
The Bench declined to make any substantive order as the learned counsel failed to trace the judgment regarding Rs.45,000/- awarded for a deceased doctor in a previous motor accident matter, stating no further clarification was required.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.A.No.3064 of 2017
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY,J.,
When the matter was argued on 15.04.2021, the learned counsel for the appellants stated that the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court, has awarded a sum of Rs.45,000/- for the Doctor who died in the motor accident and he assured to circulated the said judgment. However, the learned counsel has not circulated the said judgment. Therefore, the matter was listed "for clarification" for the couple of occasion and even today.
2.Today, i.e (on 16.07.2021), the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that he could not trace out the said judgment. Hence, no further clarification is required.
16.07.2021
rst
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Krishnan Ramasamy
Coram
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court