8. However, the Tribunal recorded that they are the unauthorized passengers who travelled against the policy conditions. Law is settled that if there is any person who travelled as loadmen, the insurance coverage to the vehicle would be extended to the loadmen also. When such being the case, the question of treating the claimants as unauthorized passengers who travelled against the violation of the policy conditions does not arise. Therefore, I do not find any merits in these appeals and find no substance in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant. Further I do not find any infirmities in the judgment of the Tribunal with regard to the fixation of liability against the appellant insurance Company. Hence, this Court is of the opinion that there is no error, in the judgment of the Court below. Thus, the judgment and decree passed by the Tribunal made in M.C.O.P. Nos.252 and 253 of 2013 by order dated 27.12.2016 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvannamalai, is hereby confirmed.
