Tadikonda Adinarayana Rao v. Taidkonda(Ghali)Lalitha Phani Kumari
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE :…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE : 05.10.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
C.M.A.No.2964 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.22473 of 2018
Tadikonda Adinarayana Rao
... Petitioner
-vs-
Tadikonda (Ghali) Lalitha Phani Kumari ... Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1985, to set aside the order and decree passed by the Court below in I.A.No.1584 of 2017 in O.P.No.4826 of 2015 dated 12.10.2018 on the file of the IV Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai.
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.,)
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed to set aside the order and decree dated 12.10.2018 in I.A.No.1584 of 2017 in O.P.No.4826 of 2015 on the file of the IV Additional Family Court, Chennai.
2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner would state that the issue has been settled between the parties and there is nothing survives in this matter for further adjudication.
3.Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Jer
To
The IV Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai.
C.M.A.No.2964 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.22473 of 2018
JPII (CO) PR (03/12/2021)
Tadikonda Adinarayana Rao
Tadikonda (Ghali) Lalitha Phani Kumari
K.Kalyanasundaram
V.Sivagnanam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court