Disposed

R.Vengidusamy, v. The District Collector

Madras HC4 Oct 2021WP/4845/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition directed the 2nd respondent to take appropriate action on the petitioner's representation regarding illegal encroachment in Survey No.878/B within six months after providing opportunity to parties, in light of pending modifications in adjacent land.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 2nd respondent to take appropriate action on the representation dated 29.06.2019 after providing opportunity of hearing within six months.

R.Vengidusamy, Vs The District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 04.10.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM

¶5

W.P.No.4845 of 2020

¶6

R.Vengidusamy

¶7

 ...Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The District Collector,
Collectorate Buildings,Tiruppur.

¶10

2.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office,
Udumalpet,
Tiruppur District.

¶11

3.Rathinam

¶12

4.Thirumalai Samy

¶13

5.Shanmugavadivel

¶14

... Respondents

¶15

Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st
respondent to take other appropriate action based on the
petitioner's representation dated 29.06.2019 for removal of the
illegal encroachment made in Odai Poromboke land in Survey
No.878/B situated at Thali Village, Udumalpet Talu, Tiruppur
District.

¶16

For petitioner: Mr.G.Vinoth
 for N.Umapathi

¶17

For respondents: Mr.T.N.C.Kaushik

¶18

 Govt. Advocate for R1 and R2
 Mr.D.R.Arun Kumar'
 for R3 to R5

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

ORDER

¶21

(Order of the Court was made by K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J)

¶22

The petitioner seeks a direction to the first respondent
to remove the encroachment in Survey No.878/B situated at Thali
Village, Udumalpet Talu, Tiruppur District, based on his
representation dated 29.06.2019.

¶23

2.Mr.T.N.C.Kaushik, learned Government Advocate appearing
for the respondents 1 and 2, would state that the Assistant
Director, Department of Survey is conducting survey and based on
his report, the 2nd respondent would take appropriate action.

¶24

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶25

4.In the light of the submission made by the learned
Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 and 2, this
writ petition is disposed of, directing the 2nd respondent to
take appropriate action on the representation to the petitioner
dated 29.06.2019 in accordance with law, after providing
opportunity of personal hearing to all the necessary parties,
within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy
of this order.

¶26

5.It is pertinent to note that 4th respondent herein in
W.P.No.18568 of 2021 sought for modification of the UDR
measurement in S.F.No.878/B and a direction was issued to the
District Revenue Officer, Tiruppur, to consider his grievance
within a period of three months. The decision of the District
Revenue Officer will have a bearing in the action to be taken by
the 2nd respondent in this case.

¶27

6.With the above direction and observation, this Writ
Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶28

// True Copy //

¶29

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶30

ub

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

To

¶33

1.The District Collector,
Collectorate Buildings, Tiruppur.
2.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office,
Udumalpet,
Tiruppur District.
3.The District Revenue Officer, Tiruppur.
+1CC to M/s.N.Umapathi, Advocate, SR.No. 52183
+1CC to M/s.D.R.Arun Kumar, Advocate, SR.No. 51480
+1CC to The Government Pleader, SR.No. 52440

¶34

W.P.No.4845 of 2020
SPD(CO)
B.VC (08/11/2021)

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Vengidusamy, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Vengidusamy, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thirupathi Gounder Vs The District Collector

Sundar Vs Commissioner

N.T.Gopikrishnan Vs Parvathavarthini

P.Anandhaselvam Vs The Secretary to the Government

Selvi Vs The District Collector

M/s. Siechem Technologies Pvt.Ltd Vs The union of India