Dismissed

Janab M.a.Uduman Mydeen v. N.Mohammed Jafarullah

Madras HC30 Mar 2021AS(MD)/7/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismisses an appeal preferred under Order 41 Rule 1 and Section 96 of the CPC against a judgment and decree dated 01.10.2010 passed in O.S. No. 56 of 2008 by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Tirunelveli. The present court confirmed the lower court's decree and awarded no costs.

What did the court decide?

The judgment and decree dated 01.10.2010 in O.S. No. 56 of 2008 are confirmed; the appeal is dismissed; no costs in this appeal.

Janab M.a.Uduman Mydeen Vs N.Mohammed Jafarullah — Company and Corporate | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

AS(MD). No.7 of 2011

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶4

Tuesday, the Thirtieth day of March Two Thousand Twenty One

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA

¶7

AND

¶8

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice S.KANNAMMAL

¶9

AS(MD). No.7 of 2011

¶10

JANAB M.A.UDUMAN MYDEEN

¶11

¶12

N.MOHAMMED JAFARULLAH

¶13

MOHAMED HANIFA ... Respondents/Plaintiffs

¶14

Prayer :-

¶15

This Appeal suit is filed under order 41 Rule 1 and section 96 of C.P.C against the judgment and decree dated 01.10.2010 made in O.S.No.56 of 2008 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.II, Tirunelveli.

¶16

Decree:

¶17

This Appeal Suit is coming on for hearing on this day and upon perusing the grounds of appeal , the decree and judgment of the Lower Court and the material papers in this suit and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.S.Natarajan, Advocate for Appellant, and of Mr.M.P.Senthil, Advocate for Respondents and this Court doth order and decree as follows:-

¶18

1.That the judgment and decree dated 01.10.2010 passed in O.S.No.56 of 2008 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.II, Tirunelveli be and hereby is confirmed and the Appeal Suit is dismissed.

¶19

2.That there be and hereby no costs in this Appeal.

¶20

Assistant Registrar(CS-I)

¶21

// True Copy //

¶22

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

1/2

¶25

AS(MD). No.7 of 2011

¶26

¶27

The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.II, Tirunelveli.

¶28

Copy to: The Record Keeper, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai(2 copies) +1 CC to M/s.S.NATARAJAN, Advocate ( SR-14720 dated 31/03/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.M.P.SENTHIL, Advocate ( SR-14946 dated 31/03/2021 )

¶29

ORDER DATED : 30/03/2021

¶30

========================== DECREE ==========================

¶31

AS(MD). No.7 of 2011

¶32

Dismissing the AS(MD). No.7 of 2011 preferred against judgment and decree dated 01.10.2010 made in O.S.No.56 of 2008 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.II, Tirunelveli etc as stated within

¶33

KM(CO)

¶34

TR(18.05.2021) 2P 6C

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶36

2/2

Janab M.a.Uduman Mydeen v. N.Mohammed Jafarullah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Janab M.a.Uduman Mydeen v. N.Mohammed Jafarullah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijaya Vs J.Alex

State of Tamilnadu Represented Vs R.Umaselvi

The Branch Manager Vs Kesini

Iffco Tokio General Insurance Vs v.Raja

Sornalakshmi Vs K.G.Sivakumar

P.Manikandan Vs State of Tamilnadu by Its