State of Tamilnadu Represented v. R.Umaselvi
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against an order directing promotion consideration was closed. The court left the determination of monetary benefits (retrospective from joining date) to the Government, allowing time for fresh representation under G.O. No.104/2021.
What did the court decide?
Writ appeal closed with no costs; Government directed to consider representation for monetary benefits from date of joining if orders are in order.
What the court decided
W.A(MD)No.857 of 2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.03.2021 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA AND
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.KANNAMMAL W.A(MD)No.857 of 2015
and
M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015
1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Rep. by Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Secretariat,
Chennai – 600 009.
2.The Director/Commissioner of Technical Education, Chennai – 600 025.
3.The Additional Director of Technical Education, Directorate of Technical Education, Guindy,
Chennai – 600 025. ... Appellants/Respondents 1 to 3 Vs.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the promotion order should be extended to grant monetary benefits retrospectively from the date of joining instead of the date of promotion.
Whether the petitioners should be allowed to reactivate pending representations for monetary benefits under G.O. No.104 of 2021.
Whether the writ appeal needs to be disposed of or can be closed for further consideration by the Government.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State of Tamil Nadu
- appellant
Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department
- appellant
Director/Commissioner of Technical Education
- respondent
R.Umaselvi
- respondent
Arulmighu Palani Andavar Polytechnic College
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court