C.V. Manigandan v. Mr. C.V. Jayabalan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed an appeal suit filed under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code due to the appellant's non-appearance despite multiple listings.
What did the court decide?
The appeal suit was dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.07.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
A.S.No.311 of 2015
C.V.Manigandan
...Appellant/Plaintiff
Vs.
1.C.V.Jayabalan 2.C.V.Siva Subramanian
3.S.Ramani
...Respondents/Defendants
PRAYER: The Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and Decree dated 19.09.2014 passed in O.S.No.11083 of 2010 on the file of the XVIII Additional District Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
For Appellant : No Appearance
Parties & counsel
- appellant
C.V.Manigandan
- respondent
C.V.Jayabalan
- respondent
C.V.Siva Subramanian
- respondent
S.Ramani
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court