D.Nanda Kumar v. T.Usha Rani
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision allowed against order dismissing condonation of delay petition. Upper court set aside lower court order, imposed costs, and directed trial court to dispose of suit on merits within six months.
What did the court decide?
Order passed by lower court set aside; petitioner to pay Rs. 10,000 to respondent within two weeks; trial court directed to decide suit on merits within six months.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.07.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
C.R.P.No.3445 of 2018 and CMP No.19331 of 2018
D.Nanda Kumar ... Petitioner/Defendant/Petitioner
Vs
T.Usha Rani ... Respondent/Plaintiff/Respondent
Prayer :- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decretal order in IA.No.17197 of 2017 in OS.No.8473 of 2010 dated 03.09.2018 passed by the learned VI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
For Petitioner : Mr.Gopalakrishnan B
For Respondent : Mr.J.Milton Arul Rajendran
ORDER
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order dismissing the petition to condone delay in setting aside an ex parte decree admits of revision.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D. Nanda Kumar
- respondent
T. Usha Rani
Coram
G.K. Ilangovan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court