Disposed

M/s.Hatsun Agro Product Ltd. v. R.Marymable

Madras HC17 Mar 2021A/673/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras disposed of two applications regarding the handover of assets and premises under a distributor agreement. The court noted the execution of a warrant by an Advocate Commissioner and closed the applications as nothing remained for adjudication.

What did the court decide?

The applications were closed as possession was already taken by the Advocate Commissioner.

M/s.Hatsun Agro Product Ltd. Vs R.Marymable — Company and Corporate | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

/ 1 /

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION)

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE 2021

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

A. Nos.673 and 674 of 2021 In the matter of Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and In the matter of Distributor Agreement Dated 15.04.2016 between M/s.Hatsun Agro Product Limited and Mr.R.Marymable.

¶7

M/S.HATSUN AGRO PRODUCT LTD., No.5, A, Vijayarajava Road, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600 017 Having registered office at No.1/20-A, Rajiv Gandhi Salai (OMR), Karapakkam, Chennai-600 097

¶8

And also carrying on its business at Old No.AD-83/New No.AD13, Anna Nagar, OPP IOB Towers Branch, Chennai - 600 040. ..Applicant

¶9

-Vs-

¶10

R.MARYMABLE Residing at No.1/6, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ I Utha Colony, Kodimunai Post, Kanyakumari - 629 251.

..Respondent

/ 2 /

A.No.673 of 2021:

Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct

¶15

the Respondents to handover vacant possession of the premises along with

¶16

Company Assets as mentioned in the Schedule and all related documents in

¶17

terms of the Distributor Agreement dated 15/04/2016.

¶18

A.No.674 of 2021:

¶19

Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to Appoint

¶20

an Advocate Commissioner to break open the Respondent's premises along

¶21

with Police Protection and take possession of the assets as mentioned in the

¶22

Schedule and hand over the same to the Applicant.

¶23

These Applications are coming on this day before this court for

¶24

hearing the court made the following order:

¶25

There is no representation for the applicant.

¶26

The report filed by the Advocate Commissioner indicate that

¶27

the warrant has been executed and possession has been taken by the

¶28

Advocate Commissioner.

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

/ 3 /

¶31

In such view of the matter, nothing survives for further

¶32

adjudication in these applications.

¶33

Accordingly, these applications are closed.

¶34

Sd/.N.S.K.J.
17.06.2021
//Certified to be a true copy//
Dated this the day of 2021
SU/01.07.2021 COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
From 25.09.2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the
Order/Judgment Decree in this format.

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s.Hatsun Agro Product Ltd. v. R.Marymable

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Hatsun Agro Product Ltd. v. R.Marymable

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Edavana Fasal Razi and 5 others Vs R.Gopalakrishnan

M/S.Agl Electronics Vs M/s.Express Infrastructure Private Limited

M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limitd Vs Mr. Tejsingh Tanwar

M/s Tata Capital Financial Services Limited Vs Mr.Rajkumar D and another

M/s Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co., Ltd. Vs Mr.Dinesh Ukabhai Makwana and another

M/S.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co.,Ltd., Vs M/s.Swathi Transport and another