Allowed

M/S.Agl Electronics v. M/s.Express Infrastructure Private Limited

Madras HC16 Mar 2021OA/46/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an original application regarding a dispute over lease rental and agreed charges, the single-judge bench appointed an advocate as the arbitrator. The parties agreed to refer the dispute arising from the Common Area Maintenance Agreement and Leave and License Agreement to arbitration.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Mr. S.Vasudevan as Arbitrator; Application allowed; Parties to bear own costs.

M/S.Agl Electronics Vs M/s.Express Infrastructure Private Limited — Arbitration | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

O.A.No.46 of 2021

¶2

O.A.No.46 of 2021

¶3

P.T.ASHA, J.,

¶4

A memo has been filed by the applicant stating that as per the conditional orders passed by this Court, he has paid a sum of Rs.12,94,769.28p towards the lease rental and other agreed charges. The learned counsel for the respondent has admitted the same.

¶5

2.The learned counsels appearing on either side has agreed to refer the dispute to the Arbitrator. The parties have entered into two agreements, namely, Common Area Maintenance Agreement and Leave and License Agreement dated 03.11.2016 which contains separate arbitration clause.

¶6

3.Considering the above, Mr.S.Vasudevan, Advocate, is appointed as

¶7

an Arbitrator to resolve the disputes arising out of each of the Agreements.

¶8

1/4

¶9

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶10

O.A.No.46 of 2021

¶11

Accordingly, it is ordered as follows:

¶12

i)Mr.S.Vasudevan, Advocate, residing at Mangala Jyothi 4^th

¶13

Trust Cross Street, Mandavelipakkam, Chennai – 600 028, Contact No.9884289896, is appointed as the Arbitrator to enter upon reference and

¶14

adjudicate the disputes inter se the parties.

¶15

ii) The learned Arbitrator may, after issuing notice to the parties

¶16

and upon hearing them, pass an award as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of the order. It is open to the respondent to raise all legal objections as to the validity of contract.

¶17

iii) The learned Arbitrator is at liberty to fix his remuneration

¶18

and other incidental expenses as per law.

¶19

iv) The proceedings may be conducted under the aegis of the

¶20

Madras High Court Arbitration Centre and in accordance with the Madras High Court Arbitration Rules.

¶21

2/4

¶22

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶23

O.A.No.46 of 2021

¶24

5.The learned counsel for the applicant would submit that he would

¶25

advise his client to pay the lease rental and other agreed charges till the
Award passed.
The Original Application is, accordingly, allowed, leaving the parties
to bear their own costs.
16.03.2021
mps
To
Thiru.S.Vasudevan,
Advocate,
Mangala Jyothi 4 th Trust Cross Street,
Mandavelipakkam,
Chennai – 600 028.

¶26

3/4

¶27

http://www.judis.nic.in

O.A.No.46 of 2021

P.T. ASHA, J.

mps

O.A.No.46 of 2021
16.03.2021

¶32

4/4

¶33

http://www.judis.nic.in

M/S.Agl Electronics v. M/s.Express Infrastructure Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Agl Electronics v. M/s.Express Infrastructure Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited Vs M/s.Samalpatti Power Co. Pvt. Ltd.

The National Small Industries Vs M/S.Southern Indian Granite

V.Lakshmipathy Vs M.R.Lakshmi

Edavana Fasal Razi and 5 others Vs R.Gopalakrishnan

M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limitd Vs Mr. Tejsingh Tanwar

M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limitd Vs Mr. Gomu P and another