Application to condone delay exceeding 1176 days in filing reply statement allowed as no serious objection raised and reasons in affidavit accepted.
Application allowed; reply statement taken on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION)
THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2021
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
A.NO.4715 of 2021 in C.S. NO.167 of 2018
Mr.SYED TARIQ AHMED Proprietor M/s.T.M.N.NTERNATIONAL, and having his place of business at No.153, Eldams Road, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018
..Applicant/Plaintiff
-Vs-
2.Mr.S.PALANISAMY Managing Partner, M/s Kurunji Agro Product, Having his place of Business at Kanavalpatti (Post), Dindgul Natham Main Road, Near Gopalpatti, Dindugul Distict.
..Respondents/Defendants
This application praying that this Hon'ble court be pleased to
condone the delay of 1176 days in filing the reply statement in C.S.No.167 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ of 2018 and take the reply statement on record on the file of the Original
2
Side of this Hon'ble court.
This application coming on this day before this court for hearing the
court made the following order:
The learned counsel for the respondents/ defendants has not raised any serious objection for allowing this application filed by the applicant/ plaintiff, seeking to condone the delay of 1176 days in filing the reply statement in C.S. No.167 of 2018.
Sd/.A.Q.J. 16.12.2021
//Certified to be a true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2021.
SU./20.12.2021 COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
From 25.09.2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay of 1176 days in filing reply statement should be allowed.
Syed Tariq Ahmed
M/s. Kurunji Agro Product
S. Palanisamy
Abdul Qudhose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
