Allowed
Sri Narasus Coffee Company v. Narasus Roller Flour Mill
Madras HCA/3040/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
in C.S.No.698 of 2011 R.SUBRAMANIAN.J., The…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.3040 of 2017 in
C.S.No.698 of 2011
R.SUBRAMANIAN.J.,
The learned counsel for the defendants has no objection for this application for amendment being allowed, since it is a consequential amendment arising out of the change of constitution of the plaintiff firm.
2. Therefore, this application is allowed. The plaintiff to carryout amendment and file an amended copy of the plaint by 07.07.2021. 16.06.2021 dsa
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court