Dismissed

Rosenaveen v. the Asst.Director

Madras HC6 Aug 2020WP(MD)/8912/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking release of the petitioner's seized tractor. The Court discharged the petitioners on liberty to move the jurisdictional criminal court for the vehicle's release within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted liberty to approach jurisdictional criminal court for release of vehicle within two weeks.

Rosenaveen Vs the Asst.Director — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

1 W.P.(MD)No.8912 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.08.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.8912 of 2020

¶5

Rosenaveen ... Petitioner

¶6

Vs.

¶7

1.The Assistant Director, Mines and Minerals Department, Office of the Collectorate, Pudukottai District.

¶8

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Illupur Post and Taluk, Pudukottai District.

¶9

3.The Tahsildar, Kulathur Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

¶10

4.The Sub Inspector of Police, Mathur Police Station, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents

¶11

Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to release the petitioner's Tractor bearing Registration Number TN-45BP-9590.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian For Respondents : Mr.M.Rajarajan Government Advocate

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

Heard the learned counsel on either side. By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶15

This writ petition has been filed seeking release of the petition mentioned vehicle.

¶16

The learned Government Advocate states that in this case, First Information Report has been registered in Crime No.208 of 2020 on the file of the fourth respondent and the vehicle has also been produced before the jurisdictional criminal Court.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

1/2

¶19

2 W.P.(MD)No.8912 of 2020

¶20

Therefore, the petitioner has to necessarily move the jurisdictional criminal Court for release of the vehicle. On such application being filed by the petitioner, it shall be disposed of within a period of two weeks thereafter. Giving such liberty to the petitioner, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.

¶21

// True Copy //

¶22

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶23

dss/ias

¶24

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶25

To:

¶26

1.The Assistant Director, Mines and Minerals Department, Office of the Collectorate, Pudukottai District.

¶27

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Illupur Post and Taluk, Pudukottai District.

¶28

3.The Tahsildar, Kulathur Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

¶29

4.The Sub Inspector of Police, Mathur Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

¶30

+1 CC to M/s.GP ( SR-13840[F] dated 07/08/2020 )

¶31

W.P.(MD)No.8912 of 2020 06.08.2020

¶32

AP(07/08/2020) 2 P 6C

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶34

2/2

Rosenaveen v. the Asst.Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rosenaveen v. the Asst.Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N. Pitchai Vs K. Gopal

G.Rathakrishnan Vs B.Chandramohan

Thibaharan @ Jeyamohan Vs The Inspector of Police

M/S. Bhagavathi Enterprises Vs the Asst.Commissioner(St)

V.Vinayagam Vs the Chief Engineer

N. Udayakumar Vs the District Collector