G.Rathakrishnan v. B.Chandramohan
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience regarding a stay order. The court noted counsel's submission that the mischief was undone and closed the petition while reserving rights to move again if the cause of action arises later.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed without punishment on submission that mischief was undone; rights to move again reserved.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONT.P.(MD)No.393 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.08.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN CONT.P.(MD)No.393 of 2020 in WP(MD)No.6904 of 2019
: Petitioner / Petitioner
G.Rathakrishnan
Vs
1.Dr.B.Chandramohan, IAS,
The Principal Secretary to Government,
O/o Commissioner of Land Survey and Land Revenue,
Survey Illam, 3rd Floor, Cheppakam, Chennai-600 005.
2.Mr.S.Sivarasu, IAS,
The Regional Transport Authority cum District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to initiate contempt proceedings against respondents for willful disobedience of the W.M.P.(MD)No.5502 of 2019.
Whether the contempt petition should be closed as the mischief done by respondents is now undone.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
G. Rathakrishnan
- respondent
Dr. B. Chandramohan
- respondent
Mr. S. Sivarasu
- respondent
Ms. T. Santhi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court