Disposed

A.Jeyaraj v. The Commissioner

Madras HC25 Aug 2020WP(MD)/7921/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking disposal of a layout approval application pending for eight years. The Court directed the Local Planning Authority to dispose of the application within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of the order copy, without adjudging merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the third respondent (Local Planning Authority) to dispose the layout application within twelve weeks from receipt of the order copy.

A.Jeyaraj Vs The Commissioner — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.7921 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 25.08.2020

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.7921 of 2020

¶7

A.Jeyaraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner Tirunelveli Corporation Tirunelveli

¶8

2.The Director Directorate of Town and Country Planning Head Office No.807 Anna Salari, Chennai 600 002

¶9

3.The Deputy Director Town and Country Planning Office Tirunelveli Region, Xavier Colony South Bye Pass Road Tirunelveli 627 005 ....Respondents

¶10

(Respondents 2 & 3 are impleaded vide Court order dated 18.08.2020 in W.M.P(MD).No.8132 of 2020 in W.P(MD).No.7921 of 2020) Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to dispose of proceedings initiated in Na.Ka.No.9078/12/GP1 dated 21.12.2016 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 11.02.2020 within a time frame fixed by this Court.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Senthil Kumar For R1 : Mr.Aayiram K.Selvakumar For R2 & R3 : Mr.S.Angappan Additional Government Pleader

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶14

The petitioner wants disposal of the proceedings that are pending in respect of his layout approval.

¶15

3.It appears that the petitioner had submitted an application for layout approval as early as in the year 2012. Since it has https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

1/2

¶17

W.P.(MD)No.7921 of 2020

¶18

been pending for a very long period, he is constrained to file this writ petition.

¶19

4.When the matter was taken up for hearing, it is submitted that the respondent Corporation had already forwarded the papers to the Local Planning Authority on 27.07.2020. Now it is the Local Planning Authority namely the third respondent herein who must take a call in the matter. Since the petitioner's layout application is pending for almost 8 years, I am of the view that interest of justice would be met by directing the third respondent to dispose the said application within the period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the case.

¶20

5.This writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs.

¶21

Assistant Registrar(AD-II)

¶22

// True Copy //

¶23

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶24

msa

¶25

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶26

To:

¶27

1.The Director Directorate of Town and Country Planning Head Office No.807 Anna Salari, Chennai 600 002

¶28

2.The Deputy Director

¶29

Town and Country Planning Office Tirunelveli Region, Xavier Colony South Bye Pass Road, Tirunelveli 627 005.

¶30

+1 CC to M/s.GP ( SR-14951[F] dated 26/08/2020 )

¶31

W.P.(MD)No.7921 of 2020 25.08.2020

¶32

kg(CO)

¶33

TR(02.09.2020) 2P 4C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

2/2

A.Jeyaraj v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Jeyaraj v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Adaikalasamy Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

M.v.Chellaiah Vs the District Collector/Inspector of Panchayat

P. Sathiyendiran Vs the Assistant Director

R.Joseph Vs The District Collector

Madasamy Vs the Dist. Collector

Askar Vs the Secretary to Government