Disposed

Madasamy v. the Dist. Collector

Madras HC25 Aug 2020WP(MD)/7723/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court held that as a prior order dated 2014 already addressed the prayer for protecting fishery activities in the specified tank, no further order was required in the instant closed writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition closed with no costs and no further order required as the matter was already decided in a prior writ petition.

Madasamy Vs the Dist. Collector — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.7723 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.08.2020 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.7723 of 2020 and WMP(MD).No.7212 of 2020

Madasamy

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector Tenkasi District Tenkasi.

¶8

2.The Executive Engineer Public Works Department Water Resources Organization Chittar Basin Division I Tenkasi District

¶9

3.The Assistant Engineer Public Works Department Water Resources Organization Chittar Basin Division I Tenkasi District

¶10

4.Gopalasubramanian ...Respondents

¶11

Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to forbear the fourth respondent, his men or anyone to do fishery activities in Sundarapandiapuram, Periyakulam Tank, Tenkasi District.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Navaneetharaja For R1 to R3 : Mr.K.Chella Pandian Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.M.Rajarajan Additional Government Pleader For R4 : Mrs. Hema Sampath Senior Counsel For Mr.R.J.Karthick

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

In view of the order passed in W.P(MD).No.21072 of 2014, no further order is required in this writ petition. Therefore, this https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

1/2

¶16

W.P.(MD)No.7723 of 2020

¶17

Writ petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶18

Sd/-

¶19

Deputy Registrar (LA&MC)

¶20

// True Copy //

¶21

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶22

msa

¶23

Note :In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶24

To:

¶25

1.The District Collector Tenkasi District Tenkasi.

¶26

2.The Executive Engineer Public Works Department Water Resources Organization Chittar Basin Division I Tenkasi District 3.The Assistant Engineer Public Works Department Water Resources Organization Chittar Basin Division I Tenkasi District

¶27

+1 CC to M/s.GP ( SR-15092[F] dated 27/08/2020 )

¶28

W.P.(MD)No.7723 of 2020 and WMP(MD).No.7212 of 2020 25.08.2020

¶29

AP(03/09/2020) 2P 5C

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

2/2

Madasamy v. the Dist. Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madasamy v. the Dist. Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Adaikalasamy Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

M.v.Chellaiah Vs the District Collector/Inspector of Panchayat

P. Sathiyendiran Vs the Assistant Director

R.Joseph Vs The District Collector

Askar Vs the Secretary to Government

A.Jeyaraj Vs The Commissioner