Dismissed

P.Kumar, S/O. T. Pitchaiah, v. the Commissionier of

Madras HC8 Oct 2020WP(MD)/7693/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought a writ to quash an order appointing candidates junior to him to the post of Head Clerk in third-grade municipalities. The court noted the petitioner was already posted as an Assistant, deemed no further consideration necessary, and closed the petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition stands closed with no further consideration and no costs awarded.

P.Kumar, S/O. T. Pitchaiah, Vs the Commissionier of — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

W.P.(MD).No.7693 of 2008

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.10.2020 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶3

W.P.(MD).No.7693 of 2008

¶4

P.Kumar ... Petitioner

¶5

-Vs-

¶6

The Commissioner of Municipal Administration,

¶7

Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. 2. Paramasivam, Revenue Assistant, Ambasamudram Municipality, Ambasamudram, Tirunelveli District. 3. N.Vasantha, Junior Assistant, Kasipalayam Municipality, Kasipalayam, Erode District.

¶8

P.Sivaraj The Revenue Assistant, Pallipalayam Municipality, Pallipalayam, Namakkal District.

¶9

M.Malarmaran, Junior Assistant, Thiruthangal Municipality, Thiruthangal, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents

¶10

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the first respondent in Ref.Na.Ka.No.9681/08/S1, dated 12.08.2008 and quash the same insofar as it appoints the candidates who are junior to the petitioner to the post of Head Clerk in the third grade municipality and consequently direct the first respondent to appoint the petitioner herein to the post of Head Clerk in any of the third grade municipality.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.Anwar sameem For Respondents : Mr.P.Mahendran Additional Government Pleader for R1

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

1/2

¶14

W.P.(MD).No.7693 of 2008

¶15

No appearance for R2 Mr.P.S.Jeyakumar for R3 to R5

¶16

ORDER

¶17

The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to quash the order passed by the first respondent in proceedings dated 12.08.2008, wherein, a working arrangement order has been passed on certain administrative grounds.

¶18

2.Perusal of the impugned order reveals that, certain employees are posted on working arrangement basis. However, their service conditions are protected and the salary is also protected.

¶19

3.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the first respondent brought to the notice of this Court that, the writ petitioner is already posted as an Assistant in Cumbum Municipality.

¶20

4.This being the factor, the cause arose for filing of the present writ petition deserves no further consideration. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands closed. No costs.

¶21

// True Copy //

¶22

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶23

rmk

¶24

¶25

The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.

¶26

+1 CC to the SPL GP ( SR-19624[F] dated 09/10/2020 )

¶27

W.P.(MD).No.7693 of 2008 08.10.2020

¶28

SS(CO) CS(02.11.2020) 2P 3C

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

2/2

P.Kumar, S/O. T. Pitchaiah, v. the Commissionier of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Kumar, S/O. T. Pitchaiah, v. the Commissionier of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S. Chandra Bose, Vs the Government of Tamil Nadu

A. Duraipandy, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

T.Gurusamy Vs the Chief Educational

P.Nagamanickam, Vs the Director General of Police

S. Arumugam, Vs the Secretary to Government

A. Rangasamy, Vs Government of Tamilnadu