Dismissed

Thangaradhi v. the Manager

Madras HC26 Aug 2020WP(MD)/5374/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a writ to restrain banks from withdrawing funds based on a representation by a third respondent and to limit disbursement to legal heirs until a certificate was produced. The petition was subsequently withdrawn with permission of the Court.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Thangaradhi Vs the Manager — Succession and Inheritance | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.5374 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.08.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶5

W.P.(MD)No.5374 of 2020 and W.M.P.(MD)No.4650 of 2020

¶6

Thangaradhi ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

1.The Manager, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Ltd., Beach Road, Thoothukudi. 2.The Manager, Canaran Bank, Melur Branch, Thoothukudi.

¶9

3.V.Madhavi ... Respondents

¶10

Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 & 2 not to process the application made by the 3^rd respondent to withdraw the amount held in account number 001200400118164 of Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank, Beach road, thoothukudi and 1123101049118 of Canara Bank Melur Branch, Thoothukudi, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 04.03.2020, and consequently direct the respondents 1 & 2 to disburse the amount to the legal heirs held by the petitioner's father in the above accounts only upon the submission of the legal heirship certificate issued by the competent court of law.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.S.V.Rakesh Yadav For R 1 : Mr.B.Baskar, Standing Counsel For R2 : Mr.C.Karthik Standing Counsel For R3 : Mr.S.Muthumalairaja

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and also sent a letter to the Registry to this effect.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

1/2

¶16

W.P.(MD)No.5374 of 2020

¶17

2.Permission is granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶18

Sd/-

¶19

Assistant Registrar(Crl side)

¶20

// True Copy //

¶21

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶22

dss/rmi

¶23

Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶24

To:

¶25

1.The Manager, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Ltd., Beach Road, Thoothukudi.

¶26

2.The Manager, Canaran Bank, Melur Branch, Thoothukudi.

¶27

+1 CC to M/s.S.V. RAKESH YADAV, Advocate ( SR-15044[F] dated 27/08/2020 )

¶28

W.P.(MD)No.5374 of 2020 and W.M.P.(MD)No.4650 of 2020 26.08.2020

¶29

scr(CO) TR(02.09.2020) 2P 4C

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

2/2

Thangaradhi v. the Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thangaradhi v. the Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Joseph Vs The District Collector

Madasamy Vs the Dist. Collector

Askar Vs the Secretary to Government

B.Sambandamoorthi Vs The Commissioner

G.Selvakumar Vs The Inspector of Police

M.Jeyaveera Ambigavathi Vs The Tamilnadu Housing Board