Dismissed

M/S. Unique Multifilms v. the Customs and Central Excise

Madras HC27 Aug 2020WP(MD)/15343/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought permission to withdraw its writ petition filed under Article 226 challenging an order by the Customs and Central Excise Settlement Commission. The Court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

M/S. Unique Multifilms Vs the Customs and Central… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.15343 of 2013

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 27.08.2020

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.15343 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2020

¶7

M/s.Unique Multifilms Virudhunagar (P) Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, T.Mathi Prakash, S/o.T.M.M.R.Thomas Nadar, No.7/152/2 Perali Road, Virudhunagar 626 001.

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

1.The Customs and Central Excise Settlement Commission, Additional Bench, II Floor Narmada Block,

¶11

Custom House, 60, Rajaji Salai, Chennai 600 001.

¶12

2.The Additional Director General,

¶13

Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence

¶14

Government Of India, Ministry of Finance,

¶15

C-3 “C” Wing, II Floor, Rajaji Bhavan, Besant Nagar, Chennai 600 090.

¶16

3.The Commissioner of Central Excise,

¶17

No.4, Lal Bahadur Sastri Road, Bibikulam, Madurai 625 002. ... Respondents

¶18

Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order No.12 / 2013 – C. Ex dated 26.07.2013 on the file of the 1^st respondent and quash the same and consequently directing the 1^st respondent Commission to consider the petitioner application No.SA(E)/37/2012-SC in accordance with law.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.S.P.Maharajan

¶20

For Respondents : Mr.B.Vijay Karthikeyan for R1 & R2

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and also https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ sent a letter to the Registry to that effect.

¶23

1/2

¶24

W.P.(MD)No.15343 of 2013

¶25

2.Permission is granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

Assistant Registrar ()

¶28

// True Copy //

¶29

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS )

¶30

ias/dss

¶31

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶32

+1 CC to M/s.B. VIJAY KARTHIKEYAN, Advocate ( SR-15170[F] dated 28/08/2020 )

¶33

+1 CC to M/s.S.P. MAHARAJAN, Advocate ( SR-15183[F] dated 28/08/2020 )

¶34

W.P.(MD)No.15343 of 2013

¶35

27.08.2020

¶36

SPU (07.09.2020) 2P 3C

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶38

2/2

M/S. Unique Multifilms v. the Customs and Central Excise

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Unique Multifilms v. the Customs and Central Excise

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Sambandamoorthi Vs The Commissioner

G.Selvakumar Vs The Inspector of Police

Thangaradhi Vs the Manager

V.Manoharan Nair Vs the District Collector

M/S.Shri Ramalinga Textiles (Aruppukottai)Pvt. Ltd. Vs the State Tax Officer(Inspection Cell)

T.Parthiban Vs the Manager